Search filters

List of works by Steven A. Lee

A field comparison of monitoring methods for waste anesthetic gases and ethylene oxide

conference proceedings item published in 1991

A new method to evaluate respiratory protection provided by N95 respirators against airborne dust and microorganisms in agricultural farms ⬇️

abstract published in 2004

Acetic acid vapor levels associated with facial prosthetics

journal article published in 1985

Development of a new method for measuring the protection provided by respirators against dust and microorganisms

journal article published in 2004

Development of a personal sampling setup for assessing the efficiency of respirators against fungal spores ⬇️

abstract published in 2003

Efficiency of N95 filtering facepiece respirators and surgical masks against airborne particles of viral size range: tests with human subjects ⬇️

abstract published in 2005

Exposure assessment of 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (DCB) at two chemical plants

journal article published in 1989

Health hazard evaluation determination report no. HHE-80-27-704, Airco Welding Products, Chester, West Virginia ⬇️

field study published in 1980

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-2003-0275-2926, U.S. Department of Interior, Denver, CO ⬇️

field study published in 2004

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-2004-0239-3014, MK Ballistic Systems, Hollister, California ⬇️

field study published in 2006

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-2005-0369-3034, Hurricane Katrina response ⬇️

field study published in 2007

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-2006-0357-3041, Denver Sheriff's Department, Denver, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 2007

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-80-035-1635, Bofors-Nobel/Lakeway Corporation, Muskegon, Michigan

superseded field study published in 1985

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-80-168-1204, Rola-Esmark Company, Dubois, Pennsylvania ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-80-35-1635b(revised), Bofors-Nobel/Lakeway Corporation, Muskegon, Michigan ⬇️

field study published in 1986

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-099-908, Aopor, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-263-1178, Copperweld Steel Company, Warren, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1984

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-289-971, Anchor Hocking Corporation, Chester, West Virginia ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-293-983, Bulk Mail Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-307-893, Federal Office Building, Cincinnati, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-328-1131, Geneva Rubber Company, Geneva, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-335-1566, Union Carbide Caribe, Penuelas, Puerto Rico ⬇️

field study published in 1985

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-421-1251, Great Lakes Carbon Corporation, Port Arthur, Texas ⬇️

field study published in 1983

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-436-1074, Ellis Fischel State Cancer Hospital, Columbia, Missouri ⬇️

field study published in 1983

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-456-1075, U.S. Bulk Mail Center, St. Louis, Missouri ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-467-1138, Olin Chemical Corporation, Lake Charles, Louisiana ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-81-470-1040, Federal Reserve Bank, Cincinnati, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-82-028-1249, Morton Chemical Corporation, New Iberia, Louisiana ⬇️

field study published in 1983

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-82-156-1231, Sheller-Globe Corporation, Keokuk, Iowa ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-82-186-1203, Perry Nuclear Plant, Perry, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-82-195-1200, U.S. Secret Service, Washington, D.C ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-82-196-1187, U.S. Department of Treasury, Bureau of Government Financial Operations, Washington, D.C ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-82-246-1275, Swissvale Auto Surplus Parts, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ⬇️

field study published in 1983

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-82-30-1184, Medalist-Gladiator Athletic Products Company, Leesburg, Florida ⬇️

field study published in 1982

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-82-341-1682, Great Lakes Carbon, Wilmington, California ⬇️

field study published in 1986

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-83-066-1531, Globe Industry, Lowell, Indiana ⬇️

field study published in 1984

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-83-090-1326, Fort Stanwix National Monument, Rome, New York ⬇️

field study published in 1983

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-83-129-1296, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C ⬇️

field study published in 1984

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-83-338-1399, Palmer Instruments, Incorporated, Cincinnati, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1984

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-84-011-1567, KP Industries, Delphos, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1985

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-84-023-1462, Dale Electronics, Incorporated, Yankton, South Dakota ⬇️

field study published in 1984

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-84-044-1441, Rhinehart Tire Farm, Winchester, Virginia ⬇️

field study published in 1984

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-84-053-425-1680, Montana Log Home Residents, Kalispell, Montana ⬇️

field study published in 1986

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-84-128-1601, Harshaw/Filtrol, Louisville, Kentucky ⬇️

field study published in 1985

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-84-371-1729, Orbitron Products, Delphos, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1986

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-84-458-489-1733, Schlegel, Incorporated, Rochester, New York ⬇️

field study published in 1986

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-85-003-1834, B. F. Goodrich, Woodburn, Indiana ⬇️

field study published in 1987

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-85-195-1768, Dale Electronics, Incorporated, Norfolk, Nebraska ⬇️

field study published in 1987

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-85-306-1753, Timken, Inc., Canton, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1986

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-85-307-1608, Frances Perkins Building, Washington, D.C ⬇️

field study published in 1985

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-85-454-1695, Mid Valley School, Throop, Pennsylvania ⬇️

field study published in 1986

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-86-015-1871, Uniroyal-Goodrich, Opelika, Alabama ⬇️

field study published in 1988

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-86-073-1804, South Campbell County Middle School, Alexandria, Kentucky ⬇️

field study published in 1987

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-86-269-1812, Federal Reserve Bank, Cincinnati, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1987

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-87-262-1852, Artistic Awards, Colorado Springs, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1987

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-87-309-1906, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, Missoula, Montana ⬇️

field study published in 1988

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-87-404-1893, Park County Courthouse, Fairplay, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1988

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-88-022-1926, Summitville Consolidated Mining Company, Inc., Del Norte, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1988

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-88-122-1912, Computer Products Corporation, Boulder, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1988

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-88-127-1903, C F and I Steel Corporation, Pueblo, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1988

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-88-268-L1980, Federal-Mogul Corporation, Malden, Missouri ⬇️

field study published in 1989

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-89-030-2198, Delco Remy, Olathe, Kansas ⬇️

field study published in 1992

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-89-052-2006, Alma American Labs, Fairplay, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1990

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-89-139-L2025, TAMCO, Etiwanda, California ⬇️

field study published in 1990

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-89-379-L2074 and HETA-90-282-L2074, Stone Container Corporation, Missoula, Montana ⬇️

field study published in 1990

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-90-151-L2067, Department of Energy, Westside Energy Co-Op, Denver, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1990

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-90-185-L2088, General Foods, Post Division, Modesto, California ⬇️

field study published in 1990

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-90-224-L2089, Tucson Rock and Sand Company, Tucson, Arizona ⬇️

field study published in 1990

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-91-076-2164, Silver Deer, Boulder, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1991

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-91-161-2225, Denver Police Department, Denver, Colorado ⬇️

field study published in 1992

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-91-290-2131, New England Lead Burning Co. (NELCO), Eaton Metals, Salt Lake City, Utah ⬇️

field study published in 1991

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-91-391-2174, New England Lead Burning Co. (NELCO), Eaton Metals, Salt Lake City, Utah ⬇️

field study published in 1992

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-92-080-2284, Moreno Valley Animal Control, Moreno Valley, California ⬇️

field study published in 1993

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-97-0062-2662, New Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, Alaska ⬇️

field study published in 1997

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-99-0173-2856, U.S. Park Service, Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge, Cheney, Washington ⬇️

field study published in 2001

Health hazard evaluation report: HHE-80-060-868, ITT Grinnel Corporation, Columbia, Pennsylvania ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Health hazard evaluation report: HHE-80-064-857, Martin Marietta Aluminum, Lewisport, Kentucky ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Health hazard evaluation report: HHE-80-103-827, Joel and Aronoff, Ridgefield, New Jersey ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Health hazard evaluation report: HHE-80-204-794, Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., Washington, D.C ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Health hazard evaluation report: HHE-81-019-846, Federal Reserve Bank, Cincinnati, Ohio ⬇️

field study published in 1981

Lead exposures among welders at a construction site

conference abstract published in 1995

NIOSH Hazard ID, HID 6 - exposure to mercury vapor during the use of mercury carburetor synchronizers ⬇️

NIOSH hazard ID published in 1999

Preliminary results and comparison of Japanese, Finnish, and United States carbon disulfide microaneurysm studies

conference proceedings item published in 1981

Reducing airborne lead exposures in indoor firing ranges

publication published in 1986

Technical assistance report no. TA-80-108-762, Hubert Humphrey Building, Washington, D.C

field study published in 1980

Technical assistance report no. TA-80-11, St. Bernard Police Department, indoor firing range, St. Bernard, Ohio

field study published in 1980

Technical assistance report no. TA-80-111-826, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C

field study published in 1981

Technical assistance report no. TA-80-14, Federal Government Park Building, Rockville, Maryland

field study published in 1980

Paulina is supported by:

About Paulina

Help