Search filters

List of works by Geoffrey Stewart Morrison

A comment on the PCAST report: Skip the "match"/"non-match" stage.

scientific article published on 26 October 2016

A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case.

scientific article published on 3 July 2015

A method for calculating the strength of evidence associated with an earwitness's claimed recognition of a familiar speaker

scientific article published on 09 July 2019

A response to Marquis et al. (2017) What is the error margin of your signature analysis?

scientific article published on 14 March 2018

An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system

scientific article published on 04 December 2010

Analysis of categorical response data: use logistic regression rather than endpoint-difference scores or discriminant analysis

scientific article

Avoiding overstating the strength of forensic evidence: Shrunk likelihood ratios/Bayes factors

scientific article published on 22 December 2017

Calculation of likelihood ratios for inference of biological sex from human skeletal remains

scientific article published on 27 September 2021

Comment on "A geometric representation of spectral and temporal vowel features: quantification of vowel overlap in three linguistic varieties" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2334-2350 (2006)].

scientific article published in January 2008

Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison

scientific article published on 13 August 2013

Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case

scientific article published on 17 May 2017

Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift.

scientific article published in December 2009

Guest Editor's note

scientific article published on 15 December 2016

INTERPOL survey of the use of speaker identification by law enforcement agencies

scientific article

L1-Spanish speakers' acquisition of the English /i/-/I/ contrast II: perception of vowel inherent spectral change

scientific article published in January 2009

L1-Spanish speakers' acquisition of the English /i/-I/ contrast: duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage

scientific article published in January 2008

Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs

scientific article published on 01 April 2009

Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems

scientific article published on April 14, 2011

Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions

scientific article published on 11 July 2016

Reliability of human-supervised formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparison

scientific article published in January 2013

Score based procedures for the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios - Scores should take account of both similarity and typicality

scientific article published on 19 June 2017

Special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios: Introduction to the debate

scientific article published on 14 May 2016

Testing theories of vowel inherent spectral change.

scientific article published in July 2007

The impact in forensic voice comparison of lack of calibration and of mismatched conditions between the known-speaker recording and the relevant-population sample recordings

scientific article published on 19 December 2017

Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters

scientific article

What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?

scientific article published on 29 July 2016

What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? II.

scientific article published on 20 September 2017