List of works - Elizabeth Wager

"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study

scientific article

A comparison of two cohort studies evaluating the safety of cisapride: Prescription-Event Monitoring and a large phase IV study

scientific article published on 01 January 1997

A concern that drug companies cannot ignore

A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions

scientific article published on 10 November 2018

Are prolific authors too much of a good thing?

scientific article published in July 2015

Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study

scientific article published on 30 May 2006

Authors, ghosts, damned lies, and statisticians

scientific article published in January 2007

Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers.

scientific article published on 22 November 2017

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey

scientific article published on 19 April 2014

Bad medicine: pain. Competing interests of professional societies

scientific article published on 26 January 2010

Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a publisher's perspective

scientific article published on January 2007

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus

scientific article

CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts

scientific article published in The Lancet

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration

scientific article

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration

scientific article published on 01 March 2008

Cardiac arrhythmias reported during treatment with cisapride

scientific article published on 01 January 1999

Cooperation And Liaison Between Universities And Editors (CLUE): Recommendations On Best Practice

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the committee on publication ethics

scientific article

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

scientific article published on 26 April 2012

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the committee on publication ethics (cope).

scientific article published on September 2012

Coping with scientific misconduct ⬇️

scientific article published on October 20, 2011

Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement

scientific article published on 11 September 2017

Defining and responding to plagiarism

Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework

scientific article published on 21 May 2013

Do declarative titles affect readers' perceptions of research findings? A randomized trial

scientific article published on 4 August 2016

Editorial code of conduct

scientific article published in The Lancet

Enhancing transparency and efficiency in reporting industry-sponsored clinical research: report from the Medical Publishing Insights and Practices initiative.

scientific article published on 07 May 2010

Ethical issues in preparing and publishing systematic reviews.

scientific article published on May 2011

Ethical publishing: the innocent author's guide to avoiding misconduct

scientific article published on September 2007

European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications

scientific article

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting

scientific article published on 5 May 2015

Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study

scientific article published on 15 July 2011

Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study

scientific article published on 22 January 2014

Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP.

scientific article published on 5 June 2019

Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3.

scientific article published on 11 August 2015

Good practice for publishing the results of clinical trials

scientific article

Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies

scientific article published in January 2003

Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies: why we need another set of guidelines

scientific article published on 01 January 2003

How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?

scientific article published on 01 January 2014

How journals can prevent, detect and respond to misconduct

Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication

scientific article (published 2013-02-28)

JAMA published fewer industry-funded studies after introducing a requirement for independent statistical analysis

scientific article (publication date: 22 October 2010)

Lessons from a case of overlapping publications

scientific article published in August 2009

Making medical messages stick

scientific article published on 01 August 2007

Medical editors and trial reporting: a betrayal of patient care

No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials

scientific article published on 18 December 2017

Opinions and potential solutions regarding dissemination bias from funding agencies of biomedical research in Europe

scientific article published on 16 January 2017

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals

scientific article published on 08 November 2018

Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Research Integrity

Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study

scientific article published on 21 February 2016

Publication ethics: whose problem is it?

scientific article published on January 2014

Publication ethics: whose problem is it?

Publicação responsável de pesquisa: padrões internacionais para autores

Publicação responsável de pesquisa: padrões internacionais para editores

Publishing clinical trial results: the future beckons

scientific article published on 27 October 2006

Publishing ethics and integrity

Raising the quality of publications: Now we have GPP!

Realities of trial registration: the Glaxo Wellcome experience

scholarly article by T.G. Gibbs & Elizabeth Wager published 2000 in Pharmaceutical Medicine

Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters

scientific article

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research

scientific article published on 08 January 2014

Reporting the findings of clinical trials: a discussion paper

scientific article published on June 2008

Research misconduct in the UK.

scientific article published on 4 January 2012

Response to "the corporate coauthor".

scientific article published on July 2005

Response to letter to the editor by Mc Sween-Cadieux et al. (2017)

scientific article published on 05 March 2018

Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor

scientific article published in July 2015

Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics

scientific article published in December 2009

Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

scientific article published on December 2009

Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

scientific article published in January 2010

Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.

scientific article published on June 2009

Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals

article

Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals

scientific article (publication date: 8 October 2008)

Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals

scientific article

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997–2012 ⬇️

scientific article published on June 22, 2012

The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement

scientific article

The UK should lead the way on research integrity

scientific article

The committee on publication ethics flowcharts

scientific article published in January 2010

The need for trial identifiers

scientific article published on January 2004

Too much of a good thing? An observational study of prolific authors

scientific article published on 18 August 2015

Uploading garbage files to the DOI system of a journal: a new type of misconduct

What is it for? Analysing the purpose of peer review

scientific article published in Nature

What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?

scientific article published on 3 February 2009

Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct?

scientific article

Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct?

Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.

scientific article published on 12 April 2011

Why are retractions so difficult?

Why has COPE developed guidelines for cooperation between journals and research institutions?

scientific article published in January 2012

Why has the committee on publication ethics developed guidelines for cooperation between journals and research institutions? ⬇️

scientific article published on April 1, 2012

Why should clinical trials be registered?

scientific article published in August 2014

Why we should worry less about predatory publishers and more about the quality of research and training at our academic institutions

scientific article published on 7 February 2017

List of works by Elizabeth Wager

"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study

A comparison of two cohort studies evaluating the safety of cisapride: Prescription-Event Monitoring and a large phase IV study

A concern that drug companies cannot ignore

A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions

Are prolific authors too much of a good thing?

Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study

Authors, ghosts, damned lies, and statisticians

Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers.

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey

Bad medicine: pain. Competing interests of professional societies

Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a publisher's perspective

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus

CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration

Cardiac arrhythmias reported during treatment with cisapride

Cooperation And Liaison Between Universities And Editors (CLUE): Recommendations On Best Practice

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the committee on publication ethics

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the committee on publication ethics (cope).

Coping with scientific misconduct ⬇️

Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement

Defining and responding to plagiarism

Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework

Do declarative titles affect readers' perceptions of research findings? A randomized trial

Editorial code of conduct

Enhancing transparency and efficiency in reporting industry-sponsored clinical research: report from the Medical Publishing Insights and Practices initiative.

Ethical issues in preparing and publishing systematic reviews.

Ethical publishing: the innocent author's guide to avoiding misconduct

European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting

Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study

Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study

Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP.

Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3.

Good practice for publishing the results of clinical trials

Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies

Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies: why we need another set of guidelines

How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?

How journals can prevent, detect and respond to misconduct

Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication

JAMA published fewer industry-funded studies after introducing a requirement for independent statistical analysis

Lessons from a case of overlapping publications

Making medical messages stick

Making medical messages stick

Medical editors and trial reporting: a betrayal of patient care

No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials

Opinions and potential solutions regarding dissemination bias from funding agencies of biomedical research in Europe

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals

Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Research Integrity

Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study

Publication ethics: whose problem is it?

Publication ethics: whose problem is it?

Publicação responsável de pesquisa: padrões internacionais para autores

Publicação responsável de pesquisa: padrões internacionais para editores

Publishing clinical trial results: the future beckons

Publishing ethics and integrity

Raising the quality of publications: Now we have GPP!

Realities of trial registration: the Glaxo Wellcome experience

Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research

Reporting the findings of clinical trials: a discussion paper

Research misconduct in the UK.

Response to "the corporate coauthor".

Response to letter to the editor by Mc Sween-Cadieux et al. (2017)

Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor

Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics

Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.

Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals

Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals

Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997–2012 ⬇️

The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement

The UK should lead the way on research integrity

The committee on publication ethics flowcharts